<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further Investigations Into Free Screencast Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:22:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: heated towel rails for bathrooms</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>heated towel rails for bathrooms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>Enjoy reading this, thank you:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy reading this, thank you:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswaters</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>dswaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason - thanks for telling me about freescreencast.com I will give it a more thorough road test when I am on holidays.

Hi Beth - if anyone was not clear it would be me.  I know that you like both.  It was more of a case I was less into Jing and you liked it so there must be a good reason why you do like it.  

Hi Paul - bad wording in my case.  I have easily embedded Jing but can&#039;t embed it in my Edublogs blog due to the nature of my blogging platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason &#8211; thanks for telling me about freescreencast.com I will give it a more thorough road test when I am on holidays.</p>
<p>Hi Beth &#8211; if anyone was not clear it would be me.  I know that you like both.  It was more of a case I was less into Jing and you liked it so there must be a good reason why you do like it.  </p>
<p>Hi Paul &#8211; bad wording in my case.  I have easily embedded Jing but can&#8217;t embed it in my Edublogs blog due to the nature of my blogging platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Pival</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Pival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>Actually you can easily embed videos with Jing - there&#039;s an option to do so from the share menu, and you can also get the code by visiting your Jing folder on your screencast.com account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually you can easily embed videos with Jing &#8211; there&#8217;s an option to do so from the share menu, and you can also get the code by visiting your Jing folder on your screencast.com account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Online Tools vol1 looking forward</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Online Tools vol1 looking forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>[...] This one seems to be the topic of the moment: screen casting software.  A lot has been said lately on this topic (for some great discussion on the merits of various products and their uses, take a look at Michele Martin’s Bamboo Project and Sue Waters’ Mobile Technology in TAFE).  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This one seems to be the topic of the moment: screen casting software.  A lot has been said lately on this topic (for some great discussion on the merits of various products and their uses, take a look at Michele Martin’s Bamboo Project and Sue Waters’ Mobile Technology in TAFE).  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Kanter</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Kanter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-996</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

Maybe I wasn&#039;t so clear. I love both - it isn&#039;t an either/or.

Jing is great for on the fly- micro screencasting - or screencasting as tech support or quick documentation.

Camtasia is better for more formal screencasts - because of everything you mention.

I like having both of them in my toolbox.

What I found liberating, was the 5 min limit for Jing and discipline to do one take - because of the lack of editing feature ... which helped me be more succinct.

So, they both have their place ..
B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Maybe I wasn&#8217;t so clear. I love both &#8211; it isn&#8217;t an either/or.</p>
<p>Jing is great for on the fly- micro screencasting &#8211; or screencasting as tech support or quick documentation.</p>
<p>Camtasia is better for more formal screencasts &#8211; because of everything you mention.</p>
<p>I like having both of them in my toolbox.</p>
<p>What I found liberating, was the 5 min limit for Jing and discipline to do one take &#8211; because of the lack of editing feature &#8230; which helped me be more succinct.</p>
<p>So, they both have their place ..<br />
B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: likewhoa &#187; Further Investigations Into Free Screencast Software</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>likewhoa &#187; Further Investigations Into Free Screencast Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [IMG jing]Beth Kanter has got me thinking more about screencasting since I wrote my post on Quick Tips for Improving Screencasts because Beth loves Jing while I have mixed feelings. As Beth is way more experienced at screencasting, and my background is scientific research (yes I have kept that quiet), the only option was to investigate Jing deeper. The Jing Project by TechSmith is currently allowing people free use of Jing and their web-hosting service screencast.com to capture images (and add [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt [IMG jing]Beth Kanter has got me thinking more about screencasting since I wrote my post on Quick Tips for Improving Screencasts because Beth loves Jing while I have mixed feelings. As Beth is way more experienced at screencasting, and my background is scientific research (yes I have kept that quiet), the only option was to investigate Jing deeper. The Jing Project by TechSmith is currently allowing people free use of Jing and their web-hosting service screencast.com to capture images (and add [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>Let me throw another contender into the mix:  freescreencast.com

I&#039;m the founder and primary creator of freescreencast.com.

I like Jing, and they are very close to the vision I have, but they are obviously reserved, while I can honestly say a few profound statements:

Our screencast recording software is free.  Yes, it requires .NET 2.0.  Yes, I agree that is a barrier.  However, windows update has brought most machines to that level.

Did I mention it was free?  Oh, did I mention you can upload to our site and host your screencast for free?  No limits on either bandwidth or storage.  We -want- you to share your knowledge.

And from our site you can embed the cast into your site or blog, just like youtube.

Oh, you don&#039;t want to share?  Fine!  You can use our free software and save either a WMV or FLV, in either the Microsoft or Adobe screen codec, ready to go.  We don&#039;t mind.  Use our software.  Create screencast.  More than anything, we believe two things:  screencasting is going to be big, and information wants to be free.  We&#039;re the free part of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me throw another contender into the mix:  freescreencast.com</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the founder and primary creator of freescreencast.com.</p>
<p>I like Jing, and they are very close to the vision I have, but they are obviously reserved, while I can honestly say a few profound statements:</p>
<p>Our screencast recording software is free.  Yes, it requires .NET 2.0.  Yes, I agree that is a barrier.  However, windows update has brought most machines to that level.</p>
<p>Did I mention it was free?  Oh, did I mention you can upload to our site and host your screencast for free?  No limits on either bandwidth or storage.  We -want- you to share your knowledge.</p>
<p>And from our site you can embed the cast into your site or blog, just like youtube.</p>
<p>Oh, you don&#8217;t want to share?  Fine!  You can use our free software and save either a WMV or FLV, in either the Microsoft or Adobe screen codec, ready to go.  We don&#8217;t mind.  Use our software.  Create screencast.  More than anything, we believe two things:  screencasting is going to be big, and information wants to be free.  We&#8217;re the free part of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dswaters</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>dswaters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim for reminding me about Screencast-o-matic.com -- I did road test it several months ago but definitely worth a re-visit.  

Hi Corrie - I also have to say I am very impressed with the version of Camtasia Studio I downloaded. I find it easy to use because I am used to using a range of video editing programs. But previously when I tried it (maybe 6 months ago) I did struggle with it (later version I think).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim for reminding me about Screencast-o-matic.com &#8212; I did road test it several months ago but definitely worth a re-visit.  </p>
<p>Hi Corrie &#8211; I also have to say I am very impressed with the version of Camtasia Studio I downloaded. I find it easy to use because I am used to using a range of video editing programs. But previously when I tried it (maybe 6 months ago) I did struggle with it (later version I think).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corrie Bergeron</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Corrie Bergeron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-983</guid>
		<description>We got some budget $ to buy Camtasia Studio and really like it.  I&#039;m impressed by the features of the latest release, too, though I&#039;m not sure if we can upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got some budget $ to buy Camtasia Studio and really like it.  I&#8217;m impressed by the features of the latest release, too, though I&#8217;m not sure if we can upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davies</title>
		<link>http://suewaters.com/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aquaculturepda.edublogs.org/2007/11/28/further-investigations-into-free-screencasts-software/#comment-981</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently been using the basic but very functional &#039;Screencast-o-matic&#039; from http://screencast-o-matic.com/ for quick training screencasts - particularly when I&#039;m not working at my computer.

It&#039;s javabased - so runs easily from the browser with no installation. It seems to playback screencasts online through a java-based player also - which can be a little tricky when sending a screencast over to someone whose computer isn&#039;t set up with Java - but, it also offers an MPEG export. 

Fixed area recording only - but I find it I set up to 800x600 and set the recording area just over the significant area of the application I&#039;m using (e.g. just the webpage itself if recording a screencast about using a web-based tool - and not all the menus / button-bars) then I can get good quality with plenty of space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently been using the basic but very functional &#8216;Screencast-o-matic&#8217; from <a href="http://screencast-o-matic.com/" rel="nofollow">http://screencast-o-matic.com/</a> for quick training screencasts &#8211; particularly when I&#8217;m not working at my computer.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s javabased &#8211; so runs easily from the browser with no installation. It seems to playback screencasts online through a java-based player also &#8211; which can be a little tricky when sending a screencast over to someone whose computer isn&#8217;t set up with Java &#8211; but, it also offers an MPEG export. </p>
<p>Fixed area recording only &#8211; but I find it I set up to 800&#215;600 and set the recording area just over the significant area of the application I&#8217;m using (e.g. just the webpage itself if recording a screencast about using a web-based tool &#8211; and not all the menus / button-bars) then I can get good quality with plenty of space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
